pendingGC
07-16 11:21 PM
Hello Attorney
I am on H4 visa now and when I was on F2 visa I have used medicaid and wic for prenatal care. It was used during my pregnancy only. I am never asked for that in my h4 visa inteviews. Since my husband is applying for CP for green card . Will it be a problem for me to go for CP ? Will consular office consider it a public charge and deny my GC ? Just in case if I get denial how to overcome that denial ? is there a standard process ? Will it affect my husband's GC ?
I am on H4 visa now and when I was on F2 visa I have used medicaid and wic for prenatal care. It was used during my pregnancy only. I am never asked for that in my h4 visa inteviews. Since my husband is applying for CP for green card . Will it be a problem for me to go for CP ? Will consular office consider it a public charge and deny my GC ? Just in case if I get denial how to overcome that denial ? is there a standard process ? Will it affect my husband's GC ?
wallpaper Frillr Spy, Natalie Portman in
jasmin45
08-08 12:19 PM
Do anybody know when can we use AC21?
6 months after I-485 filing or 6 months after I-485 receipt notice or 6 months after EAD
Thanks
6 months after the receipt date. Why create new thread for this question? there are several threads where you can find answers to these very questions.
6 months after I-485 filing or 6 months after I-485 receipt notice or 6 months after EAD
Thanks
6 months after the receipt date. Why create new thread for this question? there are several threads where you can find answers to these very questions.
hetalvn
09-19 05:07 PM
hi
we are paying social security and medicare taxes where as we are not entitle to any of this benefits. they are taking this taxes based on giving permanent status but they have slowed green card processing near to impossible. that's fine, but taking social security taxes is not right when we are certainly not going to part of that system.
they must stop those taxes till green card is processed.
we are paying social security and medicare taxes where as we are not entitle to any of this benefits. they are taking this taxes based on giving permanent status but they have slowed green card processing near to impossible. that's fine, but taking social security taxes is not right when we are certainly not going to part of that system.
they must stop those taxes till green card is processed.
2011 Natalie Portman.
joeshmoe
08-30 06:19 PM
Mine and my wife's 485 must have been "touched" today ... not sure why though. The status still says "Case received and pending..."
Any ideas fellow members? Could it be good sign or just standard update...?
Any ideas fellow members? Could it be good sign or just standard update...?
more...
twife
09-14 02:27 PM
Hi ,
My husband has a conviction for domestic violence. he was not jailed but is under probation. he is on h1b visa and i am on h4. his i140 was approved before the conviction. also both our visa extension were approved prior to that. currently visa stamp in both our passport has expired but we have valid i-94. i need to visit india for urgent family health issue. if i go i will need to get a new stamp. Can his arrest result in my visa getting denied at consulate. Or will it create any problems for me at port of entry?. he is not going to travel with me
Thanks in advance for ur help
My husband has a conviction for domestic violence. he was not jailed but is under probation. he is on h1b visa and i am on h4. his i140 was approved before the conviction. also both our visa extension were approved prior to that. currently visa stamp in both our passport has expired but we have valid i-94. i need to visit india for urgent family health issue. if i go i will need to get a new stamp. Can his arrest result in my visa getting denied at consulate. Or will it create any problems for me at port of entry?. he is not going to travel with me
Thanks in advance for ur help
tempworker_tn_1
03-24 12:22 PM
waiting further direction.
more...
rajeshiv
06-21 03:16 PM
Hi,
The doctor I went for Medical exam, he is not placing the 693 and supplement to 693 in the sealed cover. He is using his own form that I filled when I first went there and placing that form in the sealed cover.
Please suggest will INS accept any form other then 693?
I want to make sure what are the forms that need to be in sealed cover before I argue with the doctor.
I appreciate for your inputs.
Sorry to start a new thread.
Thanks
Raj..
The doctor I went for Medical exam, he is not placing the 693 and supplement to 693 in the sealed cover. He is using his own form that I filled when I first went there and placing that form in the sealed cover.
Please suggest will INS accept any form other then 693?
I want to make sure what are the forms that need to be in sealed cover before I argue with the doctor.
I appreciate for your inputs.
Sorry to start a new thread.
Thanks
Raj..
2010 thin natalie portman
Simon Henriksen
07-16 06:46 AM
I can offer your personal or small company a nice looking website for about $250.
I can do simple flash, and HTML. I have experience with different kind of java scripts, and movabletype. I can set up a forum for you if you want that too.
Intersted? Just reply, and tell me what you need and what imagine you have in your head.
/
Simon Henriksen
I can do simple flash, and HTML. I have experience with different kind of java scripts, and movabletype. I can set up a forum for you if you want that too.
Intersted? Just reply, and tell me what you need and what imagine you have in your head.
/
Simon Henriksen
more...
Macaca
03-11 06:42 PM
Some paras from Securing Iraq Votes, One at a Time (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/10/AR2007031001300.html) -- House Democratic Leaders Methodically Build Support for War Plan
By Jonathan Weisman, Washington Post Staff Writer, Sunday, March 11, 2007
Rep. Jerry Nadler was the only lawmaker at a meeting of all House Democrats on Thursday to stand up and declare that he could not support a compromise plan to fund the Iraq war with a timeline to end the conflict. So some party leaders had written him off even as he joined House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for a private meeting.
In the confines of the speaker's suite, Nadler (N.Y.) could be specific. He sought assurances from Pelosi (Calif.) that President Bush would be compelled to withdraw all troops from combat by August 2008, as the legislation proposed. He wanted to know: "What is the legal compulsion to follow this timeline?"
A Pelosi aide disappeared from the meeting for a few minutes and returned with a few lines of legislative text offering what Nadler wanted to hear: Once troops are out of Iraq, no money would be available to put them back in, outside the narrow exceptions of targeted counterterrorism operations, embassy protection and efforts to train Iraqis.
"You know," Nadler said after a pause, "I think that's okay."
Nadler's conversion was a sign of the member-by-member, slow but deliberate headway Democratic leaders say they are making in their efforts to cobble together the 218 supporters they need to pass one of the most consequential pieces of defense legislation in decades, a $105 billion war-funding bill that would impose strict standards of rest and readiness for the military, establish clear benchmarks for the government of Iraq and set a timeline to end U.S. involvement in the war.
Through closed-door meetings, pep rallies, private phone conversations and horse trading, Democratic leaders are moving outward from the 180 solid votes in the party's political center to win the votes on the party's left and right that will be needed to pass the bill later this month.
The cajoling will continue tomorrow as lawmakers return to Washington and the legislation is readied for markup later in the week. But there are roadblocks: Rep. Allen Boyd (D-Fla.) said some conservatives are withholding their support until the language McDermott wanted is removed.
As Democratic leaders balance those demands, the calculus is fairly straightforward, said one conservative Democrat involved in the process. Leaders are counting on winning all but a dozen of the 43 conservative Blue Dog Democrats and all but a dozen of the 75 or so members of the liberal Out of Iraq Caucus. Then, Democratic leaders are hoping, enough Republicans will break ranks to put them over the top.
By last week's end, House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.) said, they had secured about 200 votes.
But the last 18 votes will not be easy. That point was brought home Thursday morning, during the closed-door meeting in which the legislation was detailed for Democratic members. As Pelosi gave her pitch, Reps. Lynn Woolsey (Calif.), Barbara Lee (Calif.), Lloyd Doggett (Tex.) and Nadler stood up to leave for a news conference of their own. After an uncomfortable pause, Pelosi growled that she wished Democrats would be courteous enough to hear her out before talking to the media. Nadler sat down. The rest walked out.
Democratic aides concede that some party members, including Woolsey, Lee and Doggett, are all but lost. But they are not giving up.
"There's nothing guaranteed in life, but I feel very good," Emanuel said.
By Jonathan Weisman, Washington Post Staff Writer, Sunday, March 11, 2007
Rep. Jerry Nadler was the only lawmaker at a meeting of all House Democrats on Thursday to stand up and declare that he could not support a compromise plan to fund the Iraq war with a timeline to end the conflict. So some party leaders had written him off even as he joined House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for a private meeting.
In the confines of the speaker's suite, Nadler (N.Y.) could be specific. He sought assurances from Pelosi (Calif.) that President Bush would be compelled to withdraw all troops from combat by August 2008, as the legislation proposed. He wanted to know: "What is the legal compulsion to follow this timeline?"
A Pelosi aide disappeared from the meeting for a few minutes and returned with a few lines of legislative text offering what Nadler wanted to hear: Once troops are out of Iraq, no money would be available to put them back in, outside the narrow exceptions of targeted counterterrorism operations, embassy protection and efforts to train Iraqis.
"You know," Nadler said after a pause, "I think that's okay."
Nadler's conversion was a sign of the member-by-member, slow but deliberate headway Democratic leaders say they are making in their efforts to cobble together the 218 supporters they need to pass one of the most consequential pieces of defense legislation in decades, a $105 billion war-funding bill that would impose strict standards of rest and readiness for the military, establish clear benchmarks for the government of Iraq and set a timeline to end U.S. involvement in the war.
Through closed-door meetings, pep rallies, private phone conversations and horse trading, Democratic leaders are moving outward from the 180 solid votes in the party's political center to win the votes on the party's left and right that will be needed to pass the bill later this month.
The cajoling will continue tomorrow as lawmakers return to Washington and the legislation is readied for markup later in the week. But there are roadblocks: Rep. Allen Boyd (D-Fla.) said some conservatives are withholding their support until the language McDermott wanted is removed.
As Democratic leaders balance those demands, the calculus is fairly straightforward, said one conservative Democrat involved in the process. Leaders are counting on winning all but a dozen of the 43 conservative Blue Dog Democrats and all but a dozen of the 75 or so members of the liberal Out of Iraq Caucus. Then, Democratic leaders are hoping, enough Republicans will break ranks to put them over the top.
By last week's end, House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.) said, they had secured about 200 votes.
But the last 18 votes will not be easy. That point was brought home Thursday morning, during the closed-door meeting in which the legislation was detailed for Democratic members. As Pelosi gave her pitch, Reps. Lynn Woolsey (Calif.), Barbara Lee (Calif.), Lloyd Doggett (Tex.) and Nadler stood up to leave for a news conference of their own. After an uncomfortable pause, Pelosi growled that she wished Democrats would be courteous enough to hear her out before talking to the media. Nadler sat down. The rest walked out.
Democratic aides concede that some party members, including Woolsey, Lee and Doggett, are all but lost. But they are not giving up.
"There's nothing guaranteed in life, but I feel very good," Emanuel said.
hair natalie portman
tabletpc
01-10 01:34 PM
Guys,
I am at present on non-cap h1b and i have asked an employer to file for a new caped h1b in april 2008.
I have tentative plans of going to india in March end . In case i can't make it before april 1st back to US, can my new emplyer file for my New h1b while i am out side US...???
Is there any rule that, lates i-94 needs to be sent while aplying for h1b..???
greatly apppreciate any inputs....
I am at present on non-cap h1b and i have asked an employer to file for a new caped h1b in april 2008.
I have tentative plans of going to india in March end . In case i can't make it before april 1st back to US, can my new emplyer file for my New h1b while i am out side US...???
Is there any rule that, lates i-94 needs to be sent while aplying for h1b..???
greatly apppreciate any inputs....
more...
senk1s
10-10 05:23 PM
i know 2 people jul 2 filers are still waiting
called on oct 3rd - asked to wait some more time (not in database)
called on oct 3rd - asked to wait some more time (not in database)
hot Natalie Portman Follows Katies
fall2004us
09-29 06:49 PM
Very recently our company advertised for a position, this was for one of my co workers from China, company received over 200 resumes, I heard that the new rule is to reply to all the resumes and tell them why they dont qualify etc..
Our new company policy: No more employment based green cards for another 3 years :D
Our new company policy: No more employment based green cards for another 3 years :D
more...
house #Natalie Portman
kirupa
05-16 02:05 PM
Added this one up! Btw, should I put Jamie or fasterthanlight below the stamps you have created?
:P
:P
tattoo tagged as: Natalie Portman.
lecter
April 18th, 2008, 03:34 AM
Was with a bunch of D3 users!!
Nice machine. They were taking images long after the 1Ds and 1D "3"s gave up in the light....
Will be interesting to see how they deal with the noise.
Rob
Nice machine. They were taking images long after the 1Ds and 1D "3"s gave up in the light....
Will be interesting to see how they deal with the noise.
Rob
more...
pictures Natalie Portman has reportedly
eucalyptus.mp
03-13 12:37 PM
Friends,
I came to USA on H1B on Feb-07. I was working all the time except 6 months. I have pay slips with me and W2 forms. Now I am working on the project but it will be over on 15th of April-09.
I will complete my 3 years. But after this project is over, I don't know I can find the job again.
My question is,is it right time to do the visa transfer? Does it requires very recent pay stub of 3 months? I do not have pay stub for Jan and Feb-09.Does it matters?
What will be my best choice to transfer the visa(but don't know will have job after 15th so does it matters for transfer like client letter) or wait until May-June and file the 3 year extension ? But again that time I will have pay slips until April only.
I am really confused. Please give me your suggestions
I came to USA on H1B on Feb-07. I was working all the time except 6 months. I have pay slips with me and W2 forms. Now I am working on the project but it will be over on 15th of April-09.
I will complete my 3 years. But after this project is over, I don't know I can find the job again.
My question is,is it right time to do the visa transfer? Does it requires very recent pay stub of 3 months? I do not have pay stub for Jan and Feb-09.Does it matters?
What will be my best choice to transfer the visa(but don't know will have job after 15th so does it matters for transfer like client letter) or wait until May-June and file the 3 year extension ? But again that time I will have pay slips until April only.
I am really confused. Please give me your suggestions
dresses keira knightley vs natalie
ChalapathiChitturi
11-01 05:30 AM
Your I-485 will not go forward unti they receive the 140 approval.
I-485 petition will be undated automatically as soon as the corresponding I-140 is approved.
As far as I know, you don't have to inform uscis about your I-140 approval.
I-485 petition will be undated automatically as soon as the corresponding I-140 is approved.
As far as I know, you don't have to inform uscis about your I-140 approval.
more...
makeup Natalie Portman in “Black Swan
neerajkandhari
10-22 12:16 PM
I have filed for 485 /EAD and AP on july 2 2007
receipt date is July 2 2007
Notice date is Aug 29 2007
I see the processing time is 90 day at Texas
I called USCIS and they tell me that they count processing time from the Notice date and not from the date when the case was filed
We have travel plans for this Dec
Can some one pls guide me how and when i can get my AP soon
receipt date is July 2 2007
Notice date is Aug 29 2007
I see the processing time is 90 day at Texas
I called USCIS and they tell me that they count processing time from the Notice date and not from the date when the case was filed
We have travel plans for this Dec
Can some one pls guide me how and when i can get my AP soon
girlfriend Natalie told
sunny1000
08-06 01:35 PM
Read this below pdf
http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/B5eng.pdf
http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/B5eng.pdf
hairstyles stars Natalie Portman (l.
Berkeleybee
02-24 12:06 PM
All,
NPR reporter Jennifer Ludden tipped me off to this event. On Feb 23 there was a panel in this series (Fortress America: Comprehensive Immigration Reform) which pertains to us -- Fortress America: Impact on Innovation and Technology.
We should keep an eye on this site for transcripts.
http://www.abanet.org/irr/committees/immigrants/immigrationpanels.html
best,
Berkeleybee
NPR reporter Jennifer Ludden tipped me off to this event. On Feb 23 there was a panel in this series (Fortress America: Comprehensive Immigration Reform) which pertains to us -- Fortress America: Impact on Innovation and Technology.
We should keep an eye on this site for transcripts.
http://www.abanet.org/irr/committees/immigrants/immigrationpanels.html
best,
Berkeleybee
senk1s
09-27 04:04 PM
Do you mean 1099 by anychance?
Do you mean an I9 form -
that is required to be maintained by the employer for all employees (even US Citizens)
Yes on EAD you can/have to fill that
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=31b3ab0a43b5d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD
Do you mean an I9 form -
that is required to be maintained by the employer for all employees (even US Citizens)
Yes on EAD you can/have to fill that
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=31b3ab0a43b5d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD
arc
11-07 07:58 PM
but as far as the AD is concerned, an AD is for a position not for a person, if 1 AD satisfy the skill set and available position then one AD can work for multiple positions.
No comments:
Post a Comment