Tuesday, June 14, 2011

dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins

images Not the refs, not Kendrick dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. Dwyane+wade+dunk+on+kobe
  • dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. Dwyane+wade+dunk+on+kobe


  • himu73
    09-09 11:44 AM
    Good analysis. How long did you take to put this together this comparison?

    Sorry wrong post




    wallpaper dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. Dwyane+wade+dunk+on+kobe dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. Dwyane Wade got baptized in
  • Dwyane Wade got baptized in


  • gemini23
    08-02 03:44 PM
    awesome kondo. This gives me good and warm feeling. that they are working hard.




    dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. D-Wade took no mercy on
  • D-Wade took no mercy on


  • jchan
    09-10 10:00 AM
    Looks like last night's particle accelerator experiement sent us back in time!:D

    haha this is a good one :)




    2011 Dwyane Wade got baptized in dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. dwyane wade dunk on perkins.
  • dwyane wade dunk on perkins.


  • ANGEL
    07-30 02:24 AM
    Hey all,

    hope you guys have visited the IV physicians blogspot.It is very good.One of the bloggers mentioned about supporting such a move, but the question is how do we start.I myself is technlogically challenged so we have to get the expertise of the IT people.I think we should start now.



    more...

    dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. dwyane wade dunk
  • dwyane wade dunk


  • GOTGC
    07-25 07:56 AM
    We applied in Nebraska in August 2003, Cleared in State on August 29th 2003, Transferred to Chicago DOL on Sept 1st 2003..Got Certfied on Oct 16th 2003...So yes..in some states Labor was VERY Quick.




    dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. Kendrick Perkins dunks the
  • Kendrick Perkins dunks the


  • Macaca
    09-14 09:22 AM
    Is It Fixed Yet? (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=162079&postcount=1055) NY Times Editorial (editorial@nytimes.com, executive-editor@nytimes.com, managing-editor@nytimes.com), September 9, 2007
    Suit Planned Over Visas for the Highly Skilled (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=101240&postcount=620) By JULIA PRESTON (juliapreston@nytimes.com) | New York Times, July 6, 2007
    A Floral Protest Over Job-Based Visas (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=106380&postcount=682) By NINA BERNSTEIN (nbernstein@nytimes.com| New York Times, July 11, 2007



    more...

    dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. house Dwyane+wade+dunking+on
  • house Dwyane+wade+dunking+on


  • GIC
    01-14 12:57 AM
    PD : OCT 2003
    EB2 RIR
    State: Boston, MA
    45 Day Letter : Not Received




    2010 D-Wade took no mercy on dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. Not the refs, not Kendrick
  • Not the refs, not Kendrick


  • satyasaich
    07-14 02:24 PM
    Dear IVians

    Please make it happen. Just $5 will never hurt anybody's economy / budget.
    I wanted to cover 9 more souls if there is any acute shortage of even $5 (not to offend anyone), hence sent a check for $50

    Suport IV

    Satya



    more...

    dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. Miami Heat#39;s Dwayne Wade
  • Miami Heat#39;s Dwayne Wade


  • superbabu
    09-10 09:58 PM
    how short are we from 30k?.




    hair dwyane wade dunk on perkins. dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. Down On Kendrick Perkins
  • Down On Kendrick Perkins


  • gcisadawg
    03-04 11:43 PM
    do have your 140 approved?

    Nope, still waiting for I-140. Opened a ticket with both local congressman and USCIS.
    CM replied saying "file is with manager for review".....whatever that means...

    Still waiting to hear from USCIS for SR.



    more...

    dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. The throwdown was on Dwyane
  • The throwdown was on Dwyane


  • Macaca
    09-12 04:04 PM
    Michael Abramowitz: abramowitz@washpost.com *
    Joel Achenbach: achenbachj@washpost.com *
    N.C. Aizenman (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/n.c.+aizenman/): Aizenmann@washpost.com *
    Lori Aratani (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/lori+aratani/)
    Peter Baker: bakerp@washpost.com *
    Daniel J. Balz: balzd@washpost.com *
    Stephen Barr
    Jeff Birnbaum (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/jeffrey+h.+birnbaum/)
    William Branigin
    David S. Broder: davidbroder@washpost.com *
    Karin Brulliard: Brulliardk@washpost.com *
    Ruben Castaneda
    Chris Cillizza (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/chris+cillizza)
    Andrew Cockburn
    Donald B. Cofman
    Pamela Constable: Constablep@washpost.com *
    Tim Craig: Craigt@washpost.com *
    Jessica Dawson
    Daniela Deane
    Virgil Dickson
    E. J. Dionne Jr.: postchat@aol.com (doesn't work)
    Anthony Faiola: 104704.3367@compuserve.com, faiolaa@washpost.com *
    Rachel Dry
    Darryl Fears: fearsd@washpost.com *
    Marc Fisher: marcfisher@washpost.com *
    Michael A. Fletcher (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/michael+a.+fletcher/)
    Manuel Roig-Franzia
    Dan Froomkin (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/dan+froomkin/)
    Sonya Geis
    Christy Goodman: goodmanc@washpost.com *
    Annie Gowen
    George W. Grayson
    Hamil R. Harris: harrish@washpost.com *
    Jim Hoagland jimhoagland@washpost.com *
    Deborah Howell: atombudsman@washpost.com 202-334-7582 (doesn't work)
    Spencer Hsu: hsus@washpost.com *
    David Ignatius: davidignatius@washpost.com *
    S Mitra Kalita: kalitam@washpost.com *
    Paul Kane
    Cecilia Kang
    Charles Krauthammer: letters@charleskrauthammer.com *
    Howard Kurtz: kurtzh@washpost.com *
    Ernesto Londo�o
    Sebastian Mallaby: smallaby@cfr.org *
    Tammi Marcoullier
    Raymond McCaffrey
    Dana Milbank: milbankd@washpost.com *
    Mariana Minaya
    Nick Miroff: Miroffn@washpost.com *
    David Montgomery: montgomery@washpost.com *
    Lisa de Moraes
    Sylvia Moreno: morenos@washpost.com *
    Dan Morse
    Jonathan Mummolo
    Robert D. Novak (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/robert+d.+novak/)
    Amy Orndorff
    Eugene Robinson eugenerobinson@washpost.com *
    Manuel Roig-Franzia
    Candace Rondeaux
    Robert J. Samuelson: writersgrp@washpost.com *
    Marcela Sanchez: desdewash@washpost.com *
    Brigid Schulte: schulteb@washpost.com *
    Delphine Schrank
    Ian Shapira
    Michael D. Shear shearm@washpost.com *
    Robin Shulman: shulmanr@washpost.com *
    Sandhya Somashekhar: Somashekhars@washpost.com *
    Miranda S. Spivack
    Bill Turque: turqueb@washpost.com *
    Jose Antonio Vargas
    Theresa Vargas: vargast@waspost.com *
    Daniel de Vise
    William Wan
    Jonathan Weisman: Weismanj@washpost.com *
    Eric Weiss (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/eric+m.+weiss/)
    Ovetta Wiggins (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/ovetta+wiggins/)
    George F. Will georgewill@washpost.com *
    Krissah Williams: williamsk@washpost.com *
    Elizabeth Williamson (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/elizabeth+williamson/)
    Robin Wright: wrightr@washpost.com *
    Xiyun Yang: yangx@washpost.com * (doesn't work)




    hot dwyane wade dunk dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. Dwyane Wade has had a little
  • Dwyane Wade has had a little


  • ychousa
    07-19 12:58 AM
    The following post
    dont worry, the above scenario would happen only if pd remaines current.This is highly unlikely. In the next few months PD would retrogress to for instance 2004 , then you'll get your GC first :) Cheer up buddy:)

    And this post
    So the work of reviewing files goes roughly in FIFO order (that is based on RD) all round the year whether the bulletin says C, U, A, B or JAN01STONEAGE!

    say the opposite.

    The process in the second post sounds unfair, but it seems it is true, escpecially if you check this page: https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC



    more...

    house Heat dunks over Kendrick dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. DUNK OVER KENDRICK PERKINS
  • DUNK OVER KENDRICK PERKINS


  • ThinkTwice
    07-20 10:07 AM
    Did you know that Aman Kapoor the founder of IV has contributed $64000 of his personal money towards the efforts of IV? Yes that is correct Sixty Four Thousand USD. http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/...eek+exclusives
    I was dumbfounded when I first found this out. The man must have real conviction, courage and belief in himself and this effort to do such a selfless act and I am not even talking about the hours and hours of time, mental energy, physical stress and emotional capital he must have invested into OUR effort and I am not talking about all that because that is immeasurable and there is not much we can do to repay all that back but apart from being for ever indebted there is something we can do.
    We can reach for our wallets and repay IV core members who have contributed selflessly to OUR cause.
    Every one of us has benefited in some way or the other because of our association to IV and who do we have to thank but the core team who have put so much on the line for OUR cause.
    Please join in this effort to reimburse the expenses incurred by IV core to fight for OUR cause. Join http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10708




    tattoo Kendrick Perkins dunks the dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. Ballin: Dwayne Wade Does A
  • Ballin: Dwayne Wade Does A


  • micofrost
    07-18 06:57 PM
    Does PD exist just to be able to file I-485? Or as some members say, does it also play a role after filing I-485 for adjudication? Does CIS go by PD or RD when the visas are limited?

    Let's say A has PD(Priority date) Dec 2004 and RD(Receipt Date) Jul 25 2007, and B has PD Mar 2007 and RD Jul 2 2007. Who would be adjudicated first?
    If visa numbers are current for both of them, then its a matter of luck, whose application gets processed quickly and which guy's application reaches to the approval officer first. That time both have equal chance.

    Ofcourse PD is considered for VISA numbers, not the RD. RD is good for portability issues like AC21/180 days rule. So B can switch jobs 23 days before A. Again that (180 days rule)also as per some lawyers isnt a hard n fast rule. Hope it helps.



    more...

    pictures house Dwyane+wade+dunking+on dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. In The Face: D-Wade
  • In The Face: D-Wade


  • deeph
    07-18 07:20 PM
    Thanks to IV and all its memebers for their efforts. And congrates to all on their success.

    Now its time to strengthen IV. We have just contributed (one time contribution), will again do so in future. Also will try to get friends to contribute.




    dresses Dwyane Wade has had a little dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. Number 10 – Nene on Ben Gordon
  • Number 10 – Nene on Ben Gordon


  • speddi
    07-06 09:36 AM
    http://avatarsofslavery.googlepages.com/home



    more...

    makeup Miami Heat#39;s Dwayne Wade dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. Heat dunks over Kendrick
  • Heat dunks over Kendrick


  • sam_hoosier
    01-04 11:53 AM
    Every country has negatives, and I think people will highlight or hide India's negatives depending on their intentions to go back (or not).;) It helps in justifying one's decision.

    Before we start comparing India & China, take a look at how many Chinese immigrants have either gone back or have decided to go back vs. Indians.

    If educated & materially well settled people decide to go back to India and work for the betterment of the country, I dont see why things will not improve.

    As JFK said - "ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."




    girlfriend Ballin: Dwayne Wade Does A dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. makeup dwyane wade dunk over
  • makeup dwyane wade dunk over


  • pkjena
    07-06 02:00 PM
    Here are some of the stats from Mathew Oh's website:

    According to the State Department, from October 1, 2006 through May 30, 2007, the USCIS requested and was authorized the total EB visa numbers of 66,426. Between June 1 and the first few days of July (?), the USCIS requested and was authorized over 60,000 EB visa numbers, in approximately one month. Since it has been made clear by the USCIS that during the last weekend of June 30 and July 1 (2 days) the USCIS approved 25,000 EB 485 applications, apparently over 40,000 visa numbers were requested and authorized before the weekend in a period of less than one month. Obviously the 60,000 plus cases must thus have been approved (?) in one month. Unconformed sources indicate that they processed and approved (?) a substantial number of applications on Sunday, July 1, exhausting the EB numbers by July 1 and making the EB number unavailable not from July 1 but from July 2, 2007. It is interesting that even before the legal team initiates any discovery, the truth starts coming out of the cabinet a bit by bit.

    I have a question:
    Total VISA available for the year = 140,000
    USICS approved till May 31 = 66,426
    USICS approved Jun 1- Jun 29 = 40,000
    USICS approved Jun 30 - July 1 = 25,000
    So VISAs still available 140,000 - 66,426 - 40,000 - 25,000 = 8574

    So why are they Unavailable on 2nd Jjuly 2007?




    hairstyles The throwdown was on Dwyane dwyane wade dunk over kendrick perkins. dunks on Kendrick Perkins
  • dunks on Kendrick Perkins


  • JazzByTheBay
    03-12 04:05 PM
    Is more or less what I've been vouching for in the past.
    You pay the dues, you get benefits.

    Just like any other organization, since charitable donations are not enough to sustain an organization where the end-goal isn't really charity, imho.

    As far as code and prod is concerned, IV itself is not PROD as an organization just yet. We're a loosely-knit community of folks who want to work towards a common goal for out own benefit.

    If 25,000 or whatever number we're at pay/contribute/donate (whatever you want to call it) 20/50/100 $/year for "membership", we'll have a better shot at going "PROD", sustaining the infrastructure and the spirit.. and perhaps achieve our goals, imo again. :)

    jazz

    This is how You release code to PROD? no user testing at all?
    and the entire paid thing is the beginning of the end. not good.
    why didnt we even have a poll on this? crazy crazy idea.




    nixstor
    07-06 10:06 AM
    You need to change the SUBJECT also...

    /***
    FBI fingerprint bumping and checks are IGNORED for IMMIGRANTS - Can not believe it ? This is called HOMELAND SECURITY ???

    How come USCIS / DOS can ignore CRITICAL FBI name check steps ?
    ***/

    What the hell on earth is this? Do you know for sure they have ignored it? Do not add masala to the existing crap. Do you understand the consequences of these kind of spiced up stuff? We all would be sulking in the security check for ever, if DHS gets pissed off or gets a congressional hearing and the authorities get lambasted over this. You are seeing how doctors are being implicated in UK and all over. Security is the most important thing right now on this planet and western world is agog over security. I dont know from where Greg Siskind and Jay Solomon got the tip off. They tipped each of their hats off and put the story in our brains to run the show. Security is not a Joke. Do not make it a bigger issue unless you dont know whether it really has happened. The consequences can be pretty dangerous to the extent of revoking all the issued GC's in the past 20 days, if congress gets high on this. I dont know what lawyers want, but my understanding is none of us want to have negative consequences of this issue.

    No matter who screwed up, we should be conveying the following message after we say that USCIS/DOS goofed up.

    "The root cause of the situation is the inability of
    a) DOS/USCIS to recapture the visa numbers from previous years
    b) to carry forward the unused numbers for atleast one year

    If congress makes the needed legislative changes to solve the above two issues, USCIS/DOS will not be in the ugliest predicaments like they are in right now"


    Its our choice to make USCIS/DOS our enemies or we get compassionate to the situation considering how arcane the current laws are. We agree or not, we have to work with them going forward. Just that they are down and we are on a bashing spree right now doesnt mean that it will be situation for ever.




    chanduv23
    06-10 06:21 AM
    multiple year eads & ap - may or may not happen
    visa recapture - no chance
    visa increase - will not happen

    still contribute??

    What we are trying to achieve is not easy. If you are involved more closely with IV leadership - you will understand the hardships being faced at every stage.
    Issues can only be resolved if we are a strong voice, and thats what we all want to be. It takes time and we have to be patient. We are in a lot better shape than we were sometime back.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment